<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Blot on Wiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/</link>
	<description>The author of &#039;Mediocre But Arrogant&#039; &#38; &#039;Married But Available&#039;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:53:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Geisinsky</title>
		<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-9317</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Geisinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 07:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abhijitbhaduri.com/?p=394#comment-9317</guid>
		<description>That’s genuinely a fastidious movie mentioned in this piece of writing on the topic of how to write a post, therefore i got clear idea from here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That’s genuinely a fastidious movie mentioned in this piece of writing on the topic of how to write a post, therefore i got clear idea from here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymundo Underwood</title>
		<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-6552</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymundo Underwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 04:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abhijitbhaduri.com/?p=394#comment-6552</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an excellent post and that i completely accept what you said. I&#039;m trying to setup the Feed however i &#039;m certainly not very computer well written. May somebody let me know how allow me to set up the actual RSS feed so I get informed of any brand new article? You need to explain this within an straightforward method as I am getting aged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an excellent post and that i completely accept what you said. I&#8217;m trying to setup the Feed however i &#8216;m certainly not very computer well written. May somebody let me know how allow me to set up the actual RSS feed so I get informed of any brand new article? You need to explain this within an straightforward method as I am getting aged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chet Shaddock</title>
		<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-5571</link>
		<dc:creator>Chet Shaddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abhijitbhaduri.com/?p=394#comment-5571</guid>
		<description>We have all seen free ADHD  online tests. Really are these any good. Will they give me additional understanding in to my sons Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder  signs and symptoms. Am I going to discover anything at all helpful concerning my son?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have all seen free ADHD  online tests. Really are these any good. Will they give me additional understanding in to my sons Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder  signs and symptoms. Am I going to discover anything at all helpful concerning my son?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambuj Saxena</title>
		<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambuj Saxena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abhijitbhaduri.com/?p=394#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>I would like to disagree with your views. If a magician find out that one of his popular tricks got leaked out, he still has thousands of other tricks to choose from. Even creating a new trick is also just a matter of few months. But the Rorschach Test is a very widely researched psycho-analytical test with hundreds of research paper on the answers given. Given the fact that a patient knows about what the common answers are renders the whole test meaningless and the patient may avoid detection of a condition that harms him the most. Alternate tests to Rorschach exist, but none is quite as well researched, and would take decades to reach the same level of detail as Rorschach. Compare that with the fun when a magician fails to amaze the audience when they see when he shifts the bunny from his hat to his pocket. That said, I am still divided if it should be available on Wikipedia. While the information is free, the wide-reach of Wikipedia makes it available to those who might benefit had they not seen it before. I don&#039;t think psychologists lose sleep over losing livelihood because of this. People are not going to accuse a physchologist for failing to see an underlying medical condition because the patient knew the &#039;right&#039; answers. And Rorschach test is no self-help test. It is not a test to cheat and pass. People do need expert help in analysing and working on the results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to disagree with your views. If a magician find out that one of his popular tricks got leaked out, he still has thousands of other tricks to choose from. Even creating a new trick is also just a matter of few months. But the Rorschach Test is a very widely researched psycho-analytical test with hundreds of research paper on the answers given. Given the fact that a patient knows about what the common answers are renders the whole test meaningless and the patient may avoid detection of a condition that harms him the most. Alternate tests to Rorschach exist, but none is quite as well researched, and would take decades to reach the same level of detail as Rorschach. Compare that with the fun when a magician fails to amaze the audience when they see when he shifts the bunny from his hat to his pocket. That said, I am still divided if it should be available on Wikipedia. While the information is free, the wide-reach of Wikipedia makes it available to those who might benefit had they not seen it before. I don&#8217;t think psychologists lose sleep over losing livelihood because of this. People are not going to accuse a physchologist for failing to see an underlying medical condition because the patient knew the &#8216;right&#8217; answers. And Rorschach test is no self-help test. It is not a test to cheat and pass. People do need expert help in analysing and working on the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrijit P.</title>
		<link>http://abhijitbhaduri.com/2009/07/a-blot-on-wiki/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrijit P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://abhijitbhaduri.com/?p=394#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Would you apply the same principle to instructions for making biological / chemical / nuclear weapons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you apply the same principle to instructions for making biological / chemical / nuclear weapons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

