Why 2 Pizza Teams Work Better

SHARE

2 Pizza TeamWork is increasingly becoming complex. The days of the lone genius are over. While Tim Berners Lee is given credit for inventing the World Wide Web, we often forget the contributions of Robert Callieau and the several thousands of people who have continuously worked to shape the web to its present reality.

Scientific progress is usually collaborative by its very nature. While Steve Jobs gets the limelight as the one person who gave us the iPhone a decade ago, it was the collective work of several people who had to work together to make it happen. The designers of the hardware worked with the supply chain people to procure the various components. The Marketing team had to create the ads that made us sit up and take notice. The Human Resources teams deserve credit for putting together the right team.

2 Pizza Team

Jeff Bezos made history this week when he surged past Bill Gates as the richest man on earth for a short while. Bezos had a net worth of over $89 billion when markets closed, while Gates was ahead by a billion dollars. I have no doubt that Bezos will go past Gates (for one Gates is giving away his wealth) very soon.

Amazon has grown from being an online book seller, which is where it all began 22 years back to a pot-pourri of businesses. From cloud computing, movies, music, food, AI and space shuttles, Bezos is doing it all. Apple may have been the past, Amazon is definitely the future. How does Bezos do this? While most businesses become bureaucratic and sloppy as they grow in size, Bezos has kept the 2 pizza rule to keep the behemoth nimble. He keeps the team size to no more than 6-7 people.

Amazon’s rise has led to the creation of Death by Amazon Index, which tracks the performance of the companies affected by the rise of Amazon. Those 54 companies include Barnes & Noble, Costco, Best Buy, GameStop, Macy’s, Nordstrom, Sears, Target, CVS Caremark and Rite Aid and Walmart. As organizations grow, the rumor mills become far more reliable sources of information than the formal communication. The employees get far more reliable updates from the business press than their own managers. It slows down the organization far more seriously than we realize.

Quality of communication

As the number of members of a group increases, the number of links that need to be managed to keep the messages from getting tangled increases. Mathematically speaking the number of links between members in a group will be n(n-1)/2. If there are 5 people (ie n=5) in a team, there are 10 possible links to be managed. With 10 people, that number goes up to 45.

As start-ups add people to their payroll, they forget how to manage the number of communication links. Each time the business pivots, the leaders must explain the rationale to the entire organization and answer all the questions the team members may have. This is where communication breaks down. To manage time zone differences and to decentralize the process, founders will often leave the dissemination to the next level of leaders. Some leaders inevitably do not communicate the message in a timely manner. That is where cynicism and disillusionment happens.

Team members often have to invite their managers and senior leaders to review and set direction. Anyone who has tried to call for a meeting with a few senior leaders knows the nightmare of trying to match calendars. Even when the leaders manage to join the meeting, they are distracted by the messages and phone calls. Small empowered teams can really speed up things.

The 54 companies listed in the Death by Amazon index would do well to start creating 2-Pizza teams. Even if you are not one of the 54 companies listed, it may be a good idea to start trimming the team size.

Improves execution

Organizing the business in teams of 5-6 people, keeps bureaucracy at bay. It gives the teams a chance to create close bonds. Between five people, it is easy to coordinate meetings and develop a sense of ownership. The core team can keep inviting additional people as and when needed. But the 2-Pizza team can stay nimble enough to see the project through.

A smaller team helps improve execution. Amazon’s stock has risen more than 36 percent this year. If you had invested $1,000 in Amazon in July 2002 — and had held onto your shares — that money would be worth $83,000 today. In real terms it would be $61,000. Maybe 2-Pizza teams are effective after all.

===========

I was quoted in a story by HR Katha about the 2 Pizza Teams of Amazon. <click here>

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Comments

  1. Chandra says:

    The requirement of speed to address the decreasing time of release cycles propels for new kind of anchoring provisions. It’s one of the defined & adopted ways of not losing agility with increasing org sizes and that works more efficiently.

Speak Your Mind

*